I don’t know how writers, particularly nonfiction writers
trying to compose essays about real and perhaps current events, stick with a
topic when a more pressing one emerges.
I was in the middle of writing about my recent road trip through West
Virginia, a short account about people I met and things I learned when I was
completely interrupted by national news.
Emotionally ripped away by the slaughter of fellow Americans in an
upstate New York supermarket and an elementary school. It’s been hard for me to think about anything
else.
I read a New York Times account of the newest classroom tragedy, after hearing earlier reports from news
conferences held by local officials at the scene. The news comes at you in so many ways these
days. I was listening to an NPR
interview in my car in which an expert of some kind was talking about nineteen
children killed in one classroom. The NPR
interviewer, to his credit, asked this question.
“Do you know for a
fact they were all in the same classroom?”
“No, I don’t. I
assume so because Texas mandates no more than 22 kids in one classroom. It just makes sense to me. But no, I don’t know.”
It made sense to me, and I accepted his assumption. Until my brother called. My brother, older than me and as tuned in as
anyone I know to the news, was the first to suggest otherwise.
“I couldn’t sleep the other night, got up, and tuned in to
cable news. Now they’re saying he was
in more than one room. The rooms are adjoined. There were more than nineteen kids who went
through that hell. Some lived through it.”
I had been grieving for nineteen kids, and two teachers
(team teaching perhaps?) all of whom died.
Now my grief expanded to include the lifelong impact that experience
would have on those who were in those rooms but live on.
For thirty-some years I was the director of a youth
service/child welfare agency that expanded its expertise and programming from
troubled teens, including runaways and those caught up in the juvenile justice
system, to include services for those suffering neglect and physical and sexual
abuse. It was the sexual abuse that was
most chilling, although it is open to debate as to which experience is most
devastating.
Physical abuse and neglect are at least understandable to the
public. Sexual abuse was a taboo rarely
considered until the mid-80s. In the
early days when Americans first felt able to openly talk about the sexual abuse
of children, after a network news show called “Something About Amanda” starring
Ted Danson, my staff couldn’t make a public presentation about our sexual abuse
treatment program without some adult coming up after the talk and divulging
their own traumatic experience. The lid
came off the dynamics of sexual abuse, most often familial, and the specter of
its damage, the sheer extent of the trauma suffered by those abused and not
believed, or never sharing their secret, was breathtaking.
It was my job as director of a child welfare agency to read
and sign unusual incident reports, familiarize myself with court reports being
submitted by my staff, to understand the problems confronting both the children
and families we served but also the depth to which our staff and foster parents
were affected by hearing their stories.
It was as simple as taking the material from my inbox, mail received and
information from staff, walking back to my office, sitting down, and reading it. What I read was often horrific.
And confidential. Children
and families involved in our child welfare, juvenile justice, and family court
systems have a right to privacy. I could
talk to my staff who were involved about what I was reading, and I did often,
but not to family and friends close to me.
It was hard. I knew things about
my community that others did not, and I couldn’t talk about it.
I retired over ten years ago. Things have changed. Privacy
laws and confidentiality measures have remained the same, but we have changed
our attitudes about volunteering information about ourselves. Social media has made us all reporters. Both journalists and everyday people are
giving us more information than ever before.
You must look at it closely for accuracy, but there is no shortage of material
to review. In fact, I sometimes feel
we’re drowning in it.
After the initial press conference following the mass murder in a
Uvalde Texas elementary school, in which the Governor of the state flanked by
its ranking U.S. Senator and others told the world a school resource officer
confronted the gunman and brave law enforcement officials ran towards the deadly
attacker, we learned otherwise.
The school resource officer was not on school grounds. Upon returning to his post, he drove past the alleged
killer who was in the vicinity of his wrecked truck, and never challenged the alleged
killer’s entry into the school he was hired to protect. (I’m dropping the alleged adjective. To my attorney friends, I admit I’m wrong to
do so.) The killer entered the school
through a propped open side door. He
shot his way into a classroom before the teacher could lock it. That room adjoined another classroom, and methodically,
over time, he killed both teachers and students in both rooms with an AR-15-style rifle he’d purchased legally days earlier on his 18th
birthday. He was armed with more rounds
of ammunition than is supplied to U.S. soldiers in battle, clip after clip of
deadly merciless bullets. Shell casings
at the scene told police he had fired 142 rounds of that ammunition.
A law enforcement official in charge, commanding 19 or so
armed policemen inside the school, delayed engaging the killer who was inside
the classroom for nearly an hour until proper equipment and additional
personnel arrived. Even after they
arrived. His rationale was that the threat of further death was over, and the shooter barricaded in
the room was no longer a danger. He was
wrong.
Journalists have helped us reconstruct the scene inside that
classroom by conducting sensitive interviews in which survivors and their
families agreed to participate. CNN reporter
Norah Neus interviewed Miah Cerrillo, age 11, who was wounded but survived in her
fourth-grade classroom where so many of her classmates died.
Present at the interview was Miah’s mother. Miah
was scared to speak on camera, or to a man, because of what she experienced but
told CNN she wanted to share her story so people can know what it’s like to live
through a school shooting. She hopes
that speaking out can prevent a tragedy like the one she experienced from
happening to other kids.
There was a time when journalists would never expose
children to this type of coverage. Again,
times have changed. Miah and her family freely
consented to allow her voice to be heard.
Click this link, and click the redirect notice to view the video
The story recalled in the video is hard to hear. It’s a memory that will never be erased in her
mind. Hopefully, it can be dealt with in
therapy and its impact blunted, the damage contained at some level. The video speaks for itself. If Miah is brave enough to share her story, I
think we should listen. It’s 6 minutes
and 47 seconds out of your day.
Near the end of the tape, CNN reporter Norah Neus mentions something
that struck a chord with me as a former supplier of therapy to survivors of trauma
in a rural area. You can hear Norah’s words
in the video about the question of therapy for Miah. They go something like this.
“Miah’s parents are trying to get her some kind of therapy
help, they’ll probably have to drive to San Antonio for that. They’re starting a Go Fund Me page.”
Excuse me, but it’s bullshit that the parents of victims should
be left to their own devices to get help for their kids. There should have been social workers in that
community starting to gather resources and bring help to that community the
day after the shooting. San Antonio is 83
miles away from Uvalde. Google maps says it’s an hour and twenty-minute trip. It’s
not just Miah that needs help. Parents and
students throughout the school need help.
Teachers need help. Extended
family members need help. And police and
first responders will need a whole lot of help after this one.
Some will require good debriefing, an assessment, and a
limited amount of follow-up sessions. Others
will require medication and ongoing psychotherapy for years. They deserve great care, and they deserve to
have it delivered to them in their own community.
I’m not a trained psychotherapist by any means but I could
write a budget for a project like this.
I’d start with staff: a team of well-trained and experienced therapists,
supported by consulting psychiatrists including a child psychiatrist. I’d give them a good case manager (maybe more
depending on the numbers) that can visit kids at home, with their families, and
in the community. Included should be community
education about trauma, and integration with natural supports in the community
like churches, police, and whatever exists to support kids and families.
And rather than choosing which resources to provide from a
fixed number of dollars picked out of the sky, I would budget whatever it costs
to make this happen. Is there an
existing building that can be remodeled and furnished as an inviting,
comfortable place for therapy to be delivered?
Then rent it and get that done. Is
there nothing suitable? Then build
one. There is work to be done in Uvalde,
Texas for years and years. And
Buffalo. And on and on and on.
Come to think of it, it’s not just victims of mass shootings
that need this kind of help. Victims surviving
daily gun violence in cities and towns across the country suffer from
trauma. In our data-rich world, I think we
could map the incidence of gun violence and find neighborhoods and communities
that need a large amount of mental health treatment but have no local source of
help. Let’s set up centers there too.
And for God’s sake let’s not depend on Go Fund Me as the way
to pay for this help. Our states and the
federal government should provide comprehensive and ongoing treatment for their
citizens as long as it persists in allowing such senseless violence to occur and
until it stops it. If it proves
expensive, I suggest a healthy tax collected from gun manufacturers and sellers. It’s an industry you know. They should bear the burden of the havoc
their products wreak out of the profits they enjoy in our capitalist system
just as oil companies fund the clean up of petroleum spills that foul our
environment. Money should not be the
issue.
Helping Miah and her family and others like them should be
the issue. We should be guided by what
they want and need to be whole and healthy once again. And we
shouldn’t rest until that job is done.