Have you ever made a flip comment, meant to be humorous, then remembered it later and thought “That might actually be true.”
I responded to one of those pointless FaceBook posts that
posed the question “What is the one thing that is destroying the world as we
know it?” The real answer is no doubt
climate change, which barely showed up.
The most numerous comment, of the thousands generated, was “Joe Biden”,
which shows you who is reading generic FaceBook posts these days.
This thought came off the top of my head and I posted it without
thinking.
“It all started
with the end of hitchhiking.”
I’ve had that thought before but never expressed it. I don’t know when it happened or why and I’ve known
anyone else concerned about it. But hitchhiking
is dead, and I think it has implications.
It’s a symptom of something bigger and more troubling.
I’ve traveled a lot during my almost 72 years on Earth. I don’t know where hitchhiking falls in the
order of miles per mode of travel. I’ve
flown to Europe four times, to both Japan and Hawaii, as well as a winter trip
to Mexico or Central America nearly every year since 1988 volunteering for I
Care International’s optometry clinics.
So, air travel might account for a lot, because of the big trips.
Being an American in the rural Midwest most of my daily
travel has been in cars, old Buicks mainly in the past twenty-five years. While I drove a lot of miles between Ottawa
and both Chicago and Springfield for work, my more frequent daily commute, a benefit
of living and working in a small town, began on Ottawa’s north side and ended down
the hill on the north side of the rivers, not 2 miles away.
I own a canoe but never had a boat, and have never been on a
cruise, so nautical miles are limited mostly to ferry rides, lazy floats down the Fox, a handful
of great trips in the boundary waters, and day trips fishing from open boats
with outboard motors on Ontario lakes.
I used a Eurail pass heavily during the Summer of 1974, took
the train to Springfield for a while there in the late 80s before my cornea
transplants, and enjoyed a great ride with my wife on the rails from Montreal
to Quebec City up the St. Lawrence River valley. Now we take the Metra from Joliet to the
LaSalle Street station when we visit Chicago and the kids, but rail travel has
not amounted to much in my getting around.
But from the time that Eurail pass ran out till the end of
1975, I hitchhiked all over Europe and North Africa. I hitchhiked from the Smoky Mountains to
Ecuador and back to Danvers, Illinois in 1976, save for the occasional cheap
bus ride here and there.
And when I once again owned cars, I picked up hitchhikers
whenever I could. I considered giving
rides in return for rides given me as good karma.
I never had a bad hitchhiking experience as a rider or a driver. It was both a way of getting from place to
place and an unspoken social contract between humans. I liked hitchhiking a lot.
In its purest form hitchhiking is (or was) “I want to travel
but I don’t have much money” meets “I’m going that way and I don’t mind having
company while I do.”
Hitchhiking was (I think using the past tense is sadly accurate)
Uber and Lyft without the smartphone app, the credit card payment, or the star
ratings. Have we now monetized each and every
want and desire humans possess, or are there yet simple kindnesses that don’t
translate their worth into cash? Hitchhiking
was ride-sharing in the purest sense. It
cost neither party a dime. Yet it
created value. Call it human
capital. Call it generosity. I’m convinced hitchhiking was a good thing.
Hitchhiking was a personal choice and a voluntary act. For the hitchhiker, it started with a simple and
universally understood gesture. Extend
your arm and put out your thumb.
I think looking presentable and smiling led to more
rides. I got a lot of rides and never
turned one down, that’s for sure. I ran
to cars that slowed as they passed me and stopped, and the first thing I did
after stowing my backpack and taking a seat was to thank the driver profusely. I considered hitchhiking a purely directional
mode of travel. Take me one mile or a hundred, as long as you’re going my way. All I asked was that the driver let me out at
a spot where I had a decent chance of getting another ride.
As a driver picking up hitchhikers, I admit to slowing down
and doing a quick assessment of the person I was about to pick up. Though I may have slowed, reconsidered, and
kept going I can’t as I sit here in the shack remember an instance when I
did. Hitchhikers and those who picked
them up were a trusting group of people.
The whole premise was built on trust.
Usually, we discovered we had even more in common as we talked.
Back then driving alone isolated you from others. Now we call whomever we wish to talk to at
any time on our smartphones, and if they don’t pick up, we dictate a message or
(dangerously) text them.
Many times, I think drivers (especially long-haul truckers before
CBs) picked me up because they needed to talk to someone, either to stay awake
or simply pass the time. I was fine with
silence, but if the driver wanted to talk, I was along for the ride.
Hitchhiking without conversation was rare. It started with the
“where are you trying to go/how far are you going” exchange and built from
there. Talking, even if obligatory, taught
me how to communicate better. Meaningful
and pleasant conversations extended rides.
And on the flip side, it was very apparent that some people
who picked me up didn’t want to exchange ideas, they simply wanted someone to listen
to theirs. I did a lot of listening
while hitchhiking. Most of it was sincere
and attentive, though over time I learned to fake it. Both later proved to be good skills to have.
Hitchhikers got rides and drivers picked up hitchhikers
because we didn’t fear each other. Any
lurking fear was overridden by a trust borne out of positive experiences. To this day I don’t personally know of anyone
on either side of the equation being harmed by hitchhiking. No doubt it happened somewhere but I’m not
aware of it. So why did hitchhiking go
away?
Most contend hitchhiking is dead because it is perceived as
dangerous. So much so that police
departments discourage it, and many states ban it. Though lightly enforced, those laws had their
intended effect. Hitchhiking is so rare now
that there is a whole generation of people too young to even remember it.
The fear factor was amplified by law enforcement through
public service announcements in the 60’s and 70s in the U.S.. A 1973 FBI poster, signed by J. Edgar Hoover,
delivers this dire message under a scene of a family opening their car door to
a man with his thumb out. Sounds a lot
like Reefer Madness.
To the American Motorist: Don’t
pick up trouble! Is he a happy
vacationer or an escaping criminal—a pleasant companion or a sex maniac—a friendly
traveler or a vicious murderer? In the
gamble with hitchhikers, your safety and the lives of your loved ones are at stake. Don’t take the risk!
Ginger Strand, Author of Killer on the Road: Violence and
the American Interstate, wrote in a New York Times op-ed that there
has never been good evidence that hitchhikers, or those who pick them up, are
particularly likely to be raped or murdered.
One of only a few studies by the California Highway Patrol in 1974
concluded the results do not show that hitchhikers are overrepresented in
crimes or accidents beyond their numbers.
It’s more likely the widespread fear of hitchhiking is motivated
less by evidence than by a pair of other trends. As hitchhiking became rarer, it seemed more
dangerous because of the people still doing it.
People without cars trying to hitchhike might be perceived
as weirder, more deviant, or more dangerous.
The more stigmatized hitchhiking became the fewer drivers who were
likely to pick someone up. Fewer willing
drivers led to fewer people trying to hitch.
And the downward spiral continued.
Fear of hitchhiking fit into a general fear of strangers
that blossomed in American society over past decades. For instance, parents instruct their children
never to talk to strangers. Stranger
Danger is a word worn cliché. There is
a kind of safety bug that’s taken over in society. We’re much more reluctant to interact with
strangers than ever before. All those
empty seats, all those lonely drivers. It
seems like a wasted resource, doesn’t it?
But others believe the decline of hitchhiking has nothing to
do with fear of crime. Joesph Stromberg,
a journalist writing for Vox put together a good piece on hitchhiking
called “The Forgotten Art of Hitchhiking-and Why it Disappeared.” Here’s what he found by talking to others
about the topic.
Most experts agree that the decline of hitchhiking has
nothing to do with fear but everything to do with increased car ownership. Since the 1960s, the percentage of car
ownership in the U.S. has tripled, and the portion of households with
multiple cars has grown even faster. 20%
of us own three cars or more. Add to
that the fact that cars now last longer, and increased car ownership has extended
to lower-income families. Fewer of us need to hitchhike to get around. In developing countries, where far fewer
people own cars, hitchhiking is still commonplace.
I was talking about all this with a friend, not in the front
seat of a moving car but in the back room of a bookstore. About the same age, he also hitchhiked.
“I’ve got a ton of hitchhiking stories,” I said. “I kept notes in a journal. I’m not sure anyone would appreciate them now
because hitchhiking is so rare.”
“I think you’re wrong.
I know I’d love to hear them.”
“Maybe I’ll blog some, see how people react.”
“Please do.”