Let’s
wind up this long trip through American history. It’s not pretty, but it’s ours.
Though
he survived impeachment and remained in the White House, Andrew Johnson would
not be elected to a second term in 1868 , would not even be nominated by either party.
Johnson lost his political base. Popular Union General Ulysses S. Grant, a
moderate Republican, not a radical, won the Republican nomination for
president, and was elected over the Democratic candidate, former New York
Governor Horatio Seymour, who campaigned as the “white man’s candidate.”
Listen to an excerpt from Seymour’s speech to
the New York State Democratic Convention delivered on March 11, 1868.
…”(black people) are in form, color, and
character unlike the whites and are, in their present condition, an ignorant
and degraded race.”
Seymour criticized post-war congressional
civil rights laws that prohibited racial discrimination and established equal
citizenship rights. White terror groups,
the biggest of which was the Ku Klux Klan, suppressed the black vote in hopes
of delivering the South for Seymour and
the Democrats by carrying out violent
attacks in Alabama, Louisiana, and Georgia which resulted in hundreds of deaths
and successfully prevented black people from casting a single vote in many
counties with significant black populations.
The Democratic strategy was to carry the
South and gain enough white votes in the North to capture the Presidency. However, the Republicans, by moderating, and
slowing their rhetoric for equality of African Americans, carried most of the
Southern states and stayed in power.
The Klan retreated. Grand Wizard Nathan Bedford called for its
dissolution, claiming its mission had been highjacked by “rogue elements.” That was a refrain which became common among
Klan leaders seeking to distance themselves from the extreme violence they
encouraged. While the Klan partially
disbanded as a unified political organization, local entities continued to seek
its goals, enforcing white supremacist social mores and economic structures
through bloodshed and intimidation.
Varied white groups took up the cause of
restoring labor discipline in the absence of slavery. Vigilantes whipped and lynched black freedmen
who argued with employers, left plantations where they were contracted to work,
or displayed any economic success of their own.
But primarily, and even more destructive, was
the intense energy white terror groups focused on imposing their own vision of
a righteous society, which usually meant targeting black men for perceived
sexual transgressions against white women.
Thus, the huge number of lynchings for routinely fabricated rape
charges, often exaggerated from minor violations of the social code such as
“paying a compliment” to a white woman and other small transgressions. Through these acts of violence, white
vigilantes used terror to revive the privileges of white masculinity over the
bodies of their former slaves.
At crucial times in the history of our
country we have always maintained hope that the courts will provide a
counterbalance to the worst of our instincts as political partisans. A case in Louisiana filed against white perpetrators of murder against
blacks, in a famous riot called the Colfax Massacres, made its way through the
courts and promised to test the 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868. That amendment addresses the equal protection
and rights of former slaves by limiting the action of state and local
officials. It also addresses due
process, which prevents citizens from being illegally deprived of life,
liberty, or property.
Charges of violence against African Americans were brought
under the Civil Rights Act of 1875, also called the Enforcement Act, which was
signed into law by President Ulysses S. Grant.
The Enforcement act made it a federal crime to conspire to deprive a
citizen of his constitutional rights and allowed the federal government to
prosecute any crime committed as part of such a conspiracy. Authorities in this case charged white
defendants in the Colfax Massacre with capital offenses, subject to the death
penalty, for murdering black people.
Despite overwhelming evidence one defendant was acquitted and no
decision was reached on any others. The
case was scheduled for retrial.
But before retrial of the case, the defense questioned
whether the federal court had jurisdiction to hear the case at all, arguing
that the Enforcement Act was unconstitutional as applied to private persons who
were not state actors. In the ensuing
trial the judge ruled the Enforcement Act was unconstitutional and dismissed
the indictments, prompting an appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court accepted the case, United States v.
Cruikshank, and decided in 1876 that the 14th amendment
“prohibits a State from depriving any person of life liberty or property
without due process, but adds nothing to the rights of one citizen against
another.” That meant that the 14th
amendment only applied to actions of the State, not against violence
perpetrated by individuals. The power of
the federal government was “limited to enforcement of this guaranty.”
As a result, the Enforcement Act was a dead letter only a
year after being enacted. African
Americans in the South were left at the mercy of white terrorists, so long as
the terrorists were acting as private citizens and not under the authority of
the State.
Enforcement Act trials throughout the South had been halted
pending the Supreme Court appeal. When
Cruikshank was decided the Justice Department dropped 179 prosecutions in
Mississippi alone. Violence continued to
spread, and increasingly, attacks on African Americans in the South were carried
out by undisguised men in broad daylight.
Reconstruction was essentially over. Going forward, Southern state governments experienced
little federal oversight. Congress
returned full civil rights to Confederate leaders and restored their eligibility
to hold public office. A proposal in
Congress to discipline Georgia for violence and corruption in the 1879 election
was defeated by a five day filibuster in the Senate. Northern support for federal intervention on
behalf of black people living in the South diminished considerably.
Former Confederate General Jamel L. Kemper was inaugurated
as Governor of Virginia in 1874. He delivered
an address to the General Assembly that same year outlining the racial regime
he intended to create in the state. Here
is an excerpt from that speech.
“Henceforth, let is be understood of all, that the political
equality of the races is settled, and the social equality of the races is a
settled impossibility. Let it be
understood of all, that any organized attempt on the part of the weaker and
relatively diminishing race to dominate the domestic governments, is the
wildest chimera of political insanity.
Let each race settle down in the final resignation to the lot to which
the logic of events has inexorably consigned it.”
Former Confederate Colonel James Milton Smith, elected
governor of Georgia in 1872, said this in an 1876 interview published in the
Atlanta Journal Constitution about the status of black people-then 46% of his
state’s population.
“Well, the loss of slaves was a severe blow to the south. Still we should be just as well off without
them were the negro race less indolent and unreliable. They are constitutionally an idle, thriftless
race, always depending on the whites for everything, and it will take a century
of education before they can be brought up to the standard that will make them
in any degree useful members of the community.”
Meanwhile the courts continued to disappoint those Americans
who once hoped for equality and justice for black people. An 1896 ruling by the Supreme Court in Plessy
v. Ferguson upheld racial segregation as fully consistent with the 14th
amendment and upheld the legality of the separate but equal doctrine for public
facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality.
In doing so the Supreme Court gave great deference to
American state legislature’s inherent power to make laws regulating health,
safety, and morals (the “police power”) and to determine the reasonableness of
the laws they passed. In reality,
segregated public facilities, in particular segregated schools, were anything
but equal in quality. In nearly all
facets of public life black Americans in the South were doomed to receive
inferior services, inferior treatment, and second-class citizenship.
With those sentiments being voiced by political leaders, and
court rulings allowing discrimination, is it any wonder white people in America
felt justified in their racist attitudes?
Can you now understand why Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, black pastor of
the Bethel Baptist Church in Birmingham, who emerged from the rubble of the
parsonage next door, which had been blown to bits by sixteen sticks of dynamite
on Christmas night 1956 , approached a white policeman on the scene and told him
to “go tell your Ku Klux Klan brethren I wasn’t raised to run?”
Reverend Shuttlesworth and that police officer both knew who he
was talking about. Ku Klux Klan members
weren’t unknown at all. In fact, both men
knew not only who carried out the bombing but the city official who supported and
most likely directed, with a wink and a nod, that terrorist act. Who were the killers in the South? Who perpetrated terrorist violence for a
hundred years after the civil war?
People like Robert Chambliss, whose terrorist acts earned him the
nickname “dynamite Bob.”
Gary May, a professor of history at the University of Delaware and
the author of Bending Toward Justice: The Voting Rights Act and the
Transformation of American Democracy, by researching declassified
government files and interviewing still living players in the drama which
played out in Birmingham, describes it this way.
“What was unusual about the crime is that authorities quickly
identified the men responsible for building and placing the bomb: they were
members of a radical Klan splinter group called the Cahaba River Boys, led by
Robert Chambliss.
Chambliss first joined the Klan when he was twenty years old,
reportedly after watching The Birth of A Nation, and during the next
twenty-seven years, rose to become Exalted Cyclops of the Robert E. Lee
Klavern. He resigned in 1951 because of ‘unfavorable
publicity,’ he later said, the result of his ‘one-man war’ against blacks,
Catholics, and Jews. In the mines and
quarries of Alabama, he learned about dynamite and, in 1947, first used it to
destroy the home of a black man who legally won the right to move into a white
neighborhood. Chambliss had found his
life’s work. In 1956, he bombed Reverend
Fred Shuttlesworth’s Bethel Baptist Church and by the end of the decade was
responsible for most of Birmingham’s bombings. His friendship with long time City
Commissioner Bull Connor won him a job in the city garage and protected him
from prosecution for his numerous crimes.”
Eugene “Bull” Connor, former Democratic member of the Alabama
House of Representatives, served as an elected Commissioner of Public Safety in
Birmingham for twenty years. He oversaw
the fire and police departments, directed the use of fire hoses and attack dogs
against civil rights activists, including children, and became an international
symbol of institutional racism.
Why did it take so long to imprison the men
responsible for the rash of bombings in Birmingham? In the case of 16th Street Baptist
Church bombing, in which four young black girls were killed while attending
Sunday School, FBI agents found several eyewitnesses who could place Chambliss
and the others at the church at around 2:00 a.m., eight hours before the bomb
exploded. Two members of Chambliss’ own
family, his niece and sister-in-law, heard him make incriminating statements
and were willing to testify at trial. However, despite the urging of local FBI field
agents to present evidence to the local prosecutor and U.S. Attorney, neither
of whom had knowledge of the evidence gained by the FBI, Director J. Edgar Hoover
refused to share information. Twice he
turned down his agents requests to push the case to trial. Here is a quote from Hoover found in
declassified files:
“From an evaluation of the evidence received thus
far, the chance of successful prosecution in State or Federal Court is very
remote.”
Hoover, and many others believed strongly, and
perhaps correctly, that no Alabama jury would convict white men, even for the
murder of black children. They were not
prosecuted until 1977, five years after Hoover’s death, and twelve years after
the crime was committed. That was the
depth of moral depravity in America when it came to race in the 1960’s. Where are we now?
I know where I am. I am on Route
83 about a mile from Interstate 65. Just
beyond the overpass I’d hit a town called Evergreen, where I would pick up
Route 31, red and thick on the map, which would take me to Brewton, then East
Brewton. That would be my last road
change. A thin road, gray on the map,
Route 41, would finally take me out of Alabama.
It was evening. I’d have to drive
in the dark to Pensacola, but I didn’t mind.
My stomach told me it was time to find a restaurant. I saw a low building in the distance with
something sticking out of the roof. As I
got closer it appeared to be the tail end of a small airplane. The building was plastered with old
signs. Centered over the door was the
name of the place in large letters: The Shack. How can I not stop?
No comments:
Post a Comment